The Life Cycle of a Phenomenon tends to be defined by distinct phases.
A charismatic leader or figureheads present a new and transcendent idea that promises a panacea for struggling players.
So here we are. They’re getting ready to storm the compound in Australia. Pressure is mounting. Smoke is rising from the out-houses. One individual, vulnerable, nervous, the phrase ATTACKING MINDSET displayed prominently in chicken blood, has come staggering from the field and is removed under a blanket to a different team at Derbyshire.
Do you ever miss the beginning, when everything was fresh? The initial phase, of uninhibited aggression.
Cult leaders promise a new start, hope for a future, love, success together who all believe in the big idea.
How did it feel back then? A team united enjoying success. Ink. Forearms. Focus. Peak performance vibes. Admittedly, The team often say they don’t use the label, amusingly because if it doesn’t exist, what exactly did I just watch?
Yet it’s clear the concept. It’s the batsman playing a shot so depraved it defies description. It’s the thrill of the leader in his final form, a look that says: pensive Nordic god, beard made of wood, natural look, truly contemporary you almost imagine to look down and notice he’s fielding in the field stripped to the waist holding a fish.
It’s the batsman continuing to have permission speaking publicly, appearing as a happy little woodland creature formally attired, saying stuff like we’re challenging norms. And yes, the energy, for a significant period, was only good energy.
Development stage. Cohesion maintained through repetition of mantras. These ideas may seem irrational as a loyalty check.
Is it just me? The criticism, the anger, the feeling of letdown following the initial loss seems too strong, overdone. The performance was poor in Perth, as they often do in Australia. They were savaged defensively in a short span as the bowling and captaincy fell apart, outplayed by the opponent playing aggressively but smarter, responsive to the situation, a performer excelling with a kind of light around him.
Now there is the attacks, the anger, the perception of the team as a disgrace. The opinion suggests that England don’t just need to lose, they need to lose righteously, to be scoured, flame-throwered, defeated by the vengeful purity of Mitchell Starc’s movements, the conventional tactics of Scott Boland, out there celebrating his wickets modestly similar to getting a pleasant gift. What will this do to them?
Issues emerge from failures in the plan. Yet, mistakes are denied. It begins to thrive on hatred of the outside world.
The fact remains, half a week out the next match, we’ve entered a delicious point of tension in the lifespan of this thing. Victory is possible overseas with bold tactics. Probably, they could lose just as quickly. In case of defeat it feels like we really might be entering the decline.
Before that happens, there are two things to consider on the topic. More than two years ago, at the start, of optimism and energy, I wrote an article calling it a phenomenon. People were very angry, which demonstrated as it’s known the best way of proving that it’s not a closed group is when its acolytes send hundreds of furiously one-eyed messages denying scrutiny of its truths.
The developments recently is just as interesting. Criticism of the approach is now the trend. We have a uniformly angry internet, angry English pundits, pictures of upset travelling fans cheated out of three days of cricket, reminiscent of people wanting fairness.
Meanwhile, we have the wider backdrop of the opponent’s mixed more culturally hard-wired exasperation towards the unconventional visitors, stating, hey, that thing you love and have honed as part of your identity culturally from us, it’s just a joke in the end old boy.
And this is the real point. It’s all cults. Bazball was a cult because cricket is a cult. Or rather, English cricket has always been a cult, a circle, a private event, a closed world with centuries of tradition and mystery defining it. This has always been where entry is limited. It’s the imperial sport of the nation, the early image-makers. And surprisingly, the country is a phenomenon, a structure of hidden ranks, a monarchy still exists.
The players have been sealed up in this system from a young age. Attempting to break free, to foster positivity, they are simply replicating their own experience, forming a new circle, an exclusive group, but now with a modern squad and a leader who wants you to be yourself as long as yourself is quite a lot like myself.
Focus on the moment. Embrace challenges. But no matter how fast and far you run, things stay similar.
With this mind, now is the time to offer compassion for the movement, to recognize its positives, which are significant. How to define it? Creating a sense of freedom. Defying norms. Batting aggressively|Attacking with
Dr. Elara Voss is a tech analyst and futurist with a Ph.D. in Computer Science, specializing in emerging technologies and their societal impact.